Deaths within 14 days after dose counted as of "unvaccinated". From Data manipulation to Legal actions. WEF as professional training for politicians. Vote!
2022-06-01 Open Canada! Seminar Transcript
This transcript is still being edited.
Please revisit this page in a few days
Watch it on YouTube:
”2022-06-01: From Data to Legal actions, Deaths of "Not protected yet", WEF training for politicians”: Stream 1 (Zoom, with screen-share), Stream 2 (Facebook Live)
Good morning, good afternoon, everyone. My name is dmitry gorodnichy and welcome to our open canada seminars, which we have every wednesday and friday noon.
Two streams and commenting
As always we have two streams here: one is in zoom, where people could interact with me live and where I can see questions, comments and greetings coming from different places, and another stream is happening in facebook live. There you will not be able to interact with me live, but you can still ask questions there in comments and of course the video recordings which will be uploaded on youtube and discussed on substack newsletters and twitter. All of you are very welcome to provide your comments, ideas. There it's a great pleasure to be interacting with you and try to find answers to all your questions.
And yes - we got all the power back in ottawa, so thanks for checking on that, and we have lots of data, we have lots of things to talk about.
2:30 Agenda for this week
I will start with our website (www.IVIM.ca). We have also created this open canada portal (https://sites.google.com/view/open-canada). See i'm opening it right now and there i would be providing updates on our seminar agendas, because every week we have a new agenda. so lets go straight into seminars page here. here you would see the agenda for this week.
Exercise your democratic and human right
So, tomorrow we have ontario elections and will again remind everyone - please exercise your democratic right to vote, but also your human right to think and to be free, and we'll talk about that now.
Updates on cases following vaccination are delayed
We will look into the updates from a public health agency of canada, which normally are posted on tuesday evening or wednesday morning, but as of this morning nine o'clock, they have not updated them yet. So we will do it live with you now. And [while doing that ] we will look into the questions which were raised by the audience through the chat and through direct communication with me.
And the question is Who are these not protected yet individuals
Who are these not protected yet individuals who are listed in table 2 of public health agency of canada updates and where they are counted are they counted: as vaccinated or not vaccinated ?
… because we're always talking about “raison d’etre” or “pourquoi” - why we're vaccinating someone, why we're injecting something into somebody's body in effort to improve the situation? And it does improve in certain situations, in some situations and improves more, in some situations it maybe improves less, right ? So that's what is important to understand of course.
And another very interesting discussion is happening right now from sheldon yakiwchuk - I mentioned his name last time. He has a twitter post dedicated right now to comorbilities of covid. So when we will look into that this week it may not happen today but just this week.
And there was lots of interest about the disappearance of the “mysterious spike” of excess deaths among young people under 45 years of age in new brunswick. we dedicated a couple of episodes on that, where we have shown that the number of deaths among this category of young people have increased from five people per week to about 20 or even 25 per week as of the latest date when they were reporting, which is november last year.
5:38 Checking if PHAC updated cases following vaccination states. No it did not
UPDATE 2022-06-02: PHAC has now updated this data (with one day delay)
What we will do right now - i would like to open with you the spreadsheet, which is the spreadsheet where that generates all these plots - all these plots are generated automatically, remember? - and the last time when we have updated it was the 8th of may, and we would like to see what is happening since then . so we will go to that spreadsheet, we'll open it in a separate tab
I will also open a new page which we have created dedicated to helping people to file grievances against the government of canada, following the release of group policy grievances by the union, and we will go through all of that - one item at a time.
The data spreadsheet is open. This line currently is empty. - We cannot put anything there yet, because as of nine o'clock this data was not published yet.
This is the data of cases following vaccinate vaccination. we will click on this link in here and we will just go there with you directly right now. we'll check whether they have published maybe in the last couple of hours something, and if they did we will just update these numbers with you live together now
Ok. what we see ?- it still shows “as of may eight”. This is the same may 8th which was reported on the 24th of may. So you see, eight days have passed and they have not yet provided new updates on those numbers.
Again just to make sure everyone understands what we're doing. we're always taking these numbers shown right here in number of deaths among unvaccinated, among fully vaccinated, full vaccinated with additional dose, and we just put these numbers into that table, and then we see also there is a category called cases not yet protected.
9:10 People dying within 14 day s after vaccine, Cases not yet protected,
So, what are these numbers ? and how are they counted ? so that was the question which several people asked over the last couple of weeks, and this is why we have created a new newsletter article, which is dedicated specifically to this question.
Luckily (or of course not likely, because this question is of interest to many people all over the world) there’s lots of information has been analyzed about that, if not in canada, than in other countries related to this category of people who are essentially who have received the those, maybe the second dose, but who are not yet labeled as fully vaccinated, right?
This is why we have published this newsletter and it refers to the data which has been obtained through the freedom of information act from europe, from sweden, in particular. And the key message there was the following:
Individuals dying within two weeks of vaccination have been classified and counted as unvaccinated.
Maybe a more fair approach would be, at least, to remove them from consideration altogether. Definitely they are vaccinated. Maybe there was no time yet for the vaccine to start working.
This, of course, is what we call another example of using algorithmic bias - a technique which skews the data towards a particular outcome, a particularly desired outcome
In this case, it looks like a particular desired outcome was to show that more unvaccinated people die. you would ask the question who desired this outcome and probably those agencies who are publishing this report
Another very interesting observation was here that and of concern as well is that:
This classification of unvaccinated was applied to the 14 day period after the second dose as well not only after the first dose
12:05 How they define them in Canada
We don't know what is situation in canada. I looked into the definition of these this definition of “cases not yet protected”which is how they are called by PHAC, and this is how they define it and i posted it in the newsletter
cases not protected yet from vaccination include those whose episode date occurs less than 14 days after their first dose of vaccine
So that's how they define it. Now i wonder if death occurred within 14 days after receiving second dose? I would assume that it probably counts as fully vaccinated. To me that's how it follows from the PHAC definition.
When you look at these numbers, they're quite small (We're talking just about death cases, to make it simple). In “not yet protected” we have 4-5 per week, sometimes, negative numbers, meaning they over-counted previous week most likely (so that's why we need to average them).
Now we have included this new column “not yet protected as a percentage of total”:
And you would see that the largest percentage was in the beginning, when they started reporting - in August - September, which just when the vaccination policy was developed. It was quite a substantial number back then (
Again, i'm not sure whether this seven percent should be added to nine percent like full of vaccinated or partially vaccinated. t's not me to decide, but definitely these numbers should be somehow counted.
Now this leads us to the next question to the question of grievances, which i have already mentioned.
14:40 From data manipulation to grievances
We have created a page here called self-help and in here we have provided information related to various actions, in particular in canada, related to vaccine mandate.
You can click there and you would see: the latest update is that on 19th of may - all unions within public sector filed a grievance. And we talked about that last last week, and there was also a national post article about that.
So, what I would like to do with you now is to go into the newsletter that was written specifically to examine each clause from this grievance, because this is a very well prepared document, prepared by lawyers, who are much better versed in terminology and the rights of canadians in defending themselves.
What i have done here - i just went to the union page, which is referenced right here, (Note that the grievance is the same for all unions, and it doesn't matter whether you use my union, which is professional institute of public services canada, or another one), so that we can go one by one through this policy grievance claims. These are very striking, very clear messages, which are there. But let's start from the very beginning.
So here's the key message:
“to keep or placing vaccinated employees on leave without pay beyond april 6 is unjustified and excessive measure in light of the current context:
Indeed, we see that the context has changed dramatically since when the policy was developed. See the graph:
In august - september we had only reported about 5-10 percent of fully vaccinated in COVID cases (even not counting those in interim, in a limbo state, which are those after receiving vaccine but within 14 days from receiving it) .
And we talked about many times - that the way they reported the percentage is 10 times less than actual percentage that what was observed weekly.
Now, of course, we're eight months later, and we see the numbers have changed quite dramatically - we have now 80 percent of people who are fully vaccinated in Canada, and we also have 80 percent of people who are fully vaccinated among COVID cases - very comparable to the percentage of full vaccinated in Canada.
So the bottom line is that most countries have already declared pandemic being transitioning to endemic. And when we look at the data, we don't see much evidence that adding extra shots helps. In fact, we talked about the fact that they may potentially make it worse. And we talked about the excess deaths happening following vaccination… But let's just go back to the grievance.
The situation has changed - Unions decided to act and we thank them very much for that. And now really the new game begins, as hundreds of individual grievances are now being poured into the employers.
The details of the grievance are right here, and i would suggest that anyone - even if you are not a federal employee - read to these claims and show you compassion.
Convicted wrongfully with harshest possible measure applied
Be empathetic to all those people, who have been - as we see from this Union letter grievance - wrongfully convicted. And they were not just “convicted wrongfully”, but the harshest possible measure was applied to them, which is suspending them form work, and not just for one day, not for two days, not for five days, which happens when people do something bad - harass someone, are late to work etc.
Then, if we people do somewthin wrong, then normally what is called progressive discipline is applied: first oral reprimand, then written reprimand, then one day suspension to five day and so on - according to the guidelines of the treasury board of canada. if you someone has done something wrong, employer needs to apply progressive.
So in this case, the harshest measure was applied to all unvaccinated, which is to suspend them for the rest of their life, or oat least for more than half a year for many of them.
Even if you are not one of those people who have been affected, you can just show your empathy and compassion to them. Maybe put your comments there, anywhere. Maybe you could help those families. Some of them still were not able to find another job and could not pay for their mortgages.
And of course, the country is divided right now and people are angry on those people. People who are not affected are angry those who are affected. Sometimes it happens. This is why we talked about elections… Use democratic means to made your country better.
And, as we talk about election, let me just give you a little bit a little segway on that.
Professional training of policians provided by WEF
i've been doing training, professional training, myself every year
i am an expert in biometric technologies within the government of canada. and we do have, as part of yearly training, an opportunity to go and attend professional training in our field, where we could get up-to-date knowledge on how to do biometric identification of individuals - the knowledge which would allow us to do our job better.
so within the government of canada and many other organizations they do have their own professional development opportunities for everyone.
And all those political party members, who are there for many years, they've been also i think attending those professional development training.
Now, if i, as a data scientist working in biometrics, go to the conference which deals with biometric technologies or data science with data technologies, data visualization, the the question for you:
To which those professional development conferences, do you think, our political leaders go ?
okay, they didn't go to the data science conference. they went probably to conferences specifically designed for professional development of politicians and what are these conferences ?
the largest the most powerful and one of the most attractive, i would say, because it also sometimes is funded, it's in a good location, it's called world economic forum.
so my belief (from being for 22 years with the governmen) is that all our political party members, who've been in this professional business for many years, they also probably are trained professionally, trained as politicians - through all those many different professional development opportunities to become a better politician and to learn how to improve the world in your role as a politician.
Just as i try to improve the biometric technology or data science technology, they also probably got some training on how to do better politics, how to better manage people or improve the world. And this is why i think that most parties, which we call mainstream parties, they have professional training for many years. - Yes for many years, because it didn't start with covid just two years ago, it started as we know this economic forum started from 1971, and many law changes were made introduced because of the recommendations from world economic forum.
so if you want a fresh look, a fresh approach to what is happening in the country, you may wish to vote for a political party which is not a mainstream, which is not liberal which is not ndp (neo-democratic) and which is not green, by the way, because all members of these three main parties have been attending, as we know, probably for many years world economic forum as part of their professional training
Everything which is happening now is according to the world economic forum’s plan vision.
we know there is a portal called “great reset” and it talks about how to improve the world, how to save the environment, how to save us from anything they want us to save from.
But again now you do have a choice if of course you're still looking for the choices and you have time and you have desire andlive in canada.
Canada is a beautiful country. i've met so many people helping those affected. it's impressive . i would be most proud to live in the country and live with canadians like those whom i've been meeting since february, in particular.
they're going through all those many hardships, and they remain true to their religion, they show their best human qualities, supporting each other, helping each other, even offering each other jobs, and products, when people cannot earn money for living. so now let's go back to our weekly update.
Update on the deletion of “mysterious” spike of of deaths data
just quickly i will show you a little update on the mysterious spike of of deaths which has been observed and then was removed, erased from StatCan website.
There was some interests on that from professionals - from data professionals and legal professionals - to look more closely, because apparently it's illegal to hide evidence such as this one from public domain. so this is why i am preparing now a white paper with full analysis on this incident and all cached data. Cached data from from april and now from may all are posted on github, and any of you can open it in excel, in google sheet, and see what has been published in april see, what has been then published in may, see which data has been erased. - specifically in age group from 0 to 44 after june 1st.
the white paper is also being prepared on that, where you will see a lot of information being prepared on this incident.
All areexperts in something and all are human beings, and Canadians
Ok, i wish everyone again to support each other, vote, please talk to each other, be considerate to each other, because this is a subtle issue - Again let's understand that vaccine showed to work miraculously for particular portion of population, for particular diseases or variants. But of course it many not be the same miraculous treatment for everyone and for every possible variant or disease , and it takes time to tune it, and there are different types of vaccine and so on. and i'm no way experts in this and this is why there are many experts who are talking about this, and we could dedicate another episode just to provide you with a list of references of medical professionals - professionals in epidemiology, biomedical professionals in canada and worldwide, who have been actively analyzing these vaccines using their expertise.
again i am expert in biometrics or data science. they're experts in something else and you are expert in your field. But also you, are all of us are human beings and canadians, and we can help each other.
thank you very much for watching. please subscribe. please donate whatever amount you want, or just send me email with comments and questions. it always helps. communications always help. interaction really energizes me, helps everyone. let's keep it going. see you again next week at the same time at noon.