CIHR-funded Fisman's Fraud is mentioned again in HOC (3 DEC 2024). BeSci in GC, Information Disorder Syndrome and Its Management
Plus: Long-care efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines is finally known: Yet again, actual results are so much different from modelled results.
Lots of valuable sources/links were shared with me over the past month. Here are some - related to the behavioural science work conducted by the Gov’t of Canada, which I have discussed in my quoted below article.
Video from the House of Commons is uploaded to YouTube (IVIM Channel)
MP Colin Carrie read his remarks in the House of Commons around 5:30pm Dec 3, 2024. It is recorded in Hansard: https://www.ourcommons.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-381/hansard and is now also uploaded to IVIM Channel in two versions: a short (1 min) excerpt and long (3 min - click on image below) excerpt. Here’s the quote from it:
"The weaponization of medical research is not just an American issue. Dr. Regina Watteel, a Ph.D. in statistics, has written, an excellent exposé on the rise of Canadian hate science. Her books expose how the Liberal government, through repeated grants from CIHR, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, hired Dr. David Fisman, a researcher for hire from the University of Toronto medical school, to manipulate COVID statistics to support a failing government policy. He was touted as an expert, but his only expertise was manipulating statistics to support government overreach. His sham studies were used to justify some of the most draconian COVID policies in the world and were quoted extensively by the Liberal-friendly media. Any criticism of Fisman's fraudulent statistical analysis has been shut down and censored. Again, this is a Canadian example of a result that Carl Sagan warned us about decades ago: the fall into technocracy, where government-sanctioned expert opinion trumps hard scientific data."
Learn more: www.fismansfraud.ca.
New evidence:
Finally, on the eve of New Year 2025, three years after innovative COVID-19 vaccine have been administered to millions to people worldwide, we finally know the long-term efficacy of these vaccines: “risk of death from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is higher for those vaccinated”. Read for yourself.
Evaluation of post-COVID mortality risk in cases classified as severe acute respiratory syndrome in Brazil: a longitudinal study for medium and long term.
Front. Med., 17 December 2024. ORIGINAL RESEARCH article.
Full article: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1495428/full
Wholesome discussion: https://x.com/denisrancourt/status/1872378995813069125
Conclusion: The protective effect of COVID-19 immunization was observed up to one year after the first symptoms. After one year, the effect was reversed, showing an increased risk of death for those vaccinated. These results highlight the need for further research to elucidate the factors that contribute to these findings.
Now, Compare the real data from above peer-reviewed paper to the yet another “modelled data” published in this (not peer-reviewed) preprint. Mind the catchy title of this paper (which, I’m sure, all our industry & government funded MSM will be eager to broadcast on their channels.
Global estimates of lives and life-years saved by COVID-19 vaccination during 2020-2024. Source: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.03.24316673v1
Here’s a comment I received about this work from Gena Watteel, the author of “Fisman’s Fraud" book:
Last week I was asked to comment on the claim that the C19 vaccines saved lives. Here's a short clip where I talk about the Ioannidis study: https://x.com/ReginaWatteel/status/1867663774276067699
When I first read the Ioannidis preprint, I was embarrassed for the authors and was of the opinion that it shouldn't pass peer-review. But, after reflecting on it, I now see it as a useful exercise to demonstrate just how absurd the Lancet study (20M lives saved in yr 1) and the Ogden et al. 2022 Canadian study were. It can also be used to help frame the C19 narrative and explain obvious shortcomings to the layperson.
Like his previous work, Ioannidis conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to obtain IFR estimates. Unfortunately, in this study he takes a giant leap forward to claim lives saved without due consideration of the uncertainties in his many assumptions and he completely ignores vaccine related deaths/injuries and also ignores the increased trends in excess all-cause mortality. He openly acknowledges these shortcomings, but then wrongly claims his estimate of lives saved is conservative.
I will be doing a writeup about it on Substack after Christmas.
And here are a few other techniques industry and governments use to influence public opinion in the face of inconvenient facts related to vaccines safety and efficacy:
1.The Rise of BeSci in GC
https://impact.canada.ca/en/behavioural-science
https://impact.canada.ca/en/behavioural-science/applying-besci-covid
2. Information Disorder Syndrome and Its Management - is that
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32417871/ - JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc . 2020 Apr 30;58(224):280-285.
Abstract
Many of us may be unknowingly suffering from information disorder syndrome. It is more prevalent due to the digitized world where the information flows to every individual's phone, tablet and computer in no time. Information disorder syndrome is the sharing or developing of false information with or without the intent of harming and they are categorized as misinformation, disinformation and malinformation. The severity of the syndrome is categorized into three grades. Grade 1 is a milder form in which the individual shares false information without the intent of harming others. Grade 2 is a moderate form in which the individual develops and shares false information with the intent of making money and political gain, but not with the intent of harming people. Grade 3 is a severe form in which the individual develops and shares false information with the intent of harming others. The management of this disorder requires the management of false information, which is rumor surveillance, targeted messaging and community engagement. Repeated sufferers at the Grade 1 level, all sufferers from grade 2 and 3 levels need psycho-social counseling and sometimes require strong regulations and enforcement to control such information disorder. The most critical intervention is to be mindful of the fact that not all posts in social media and news are real, and need to be interpreted carefully.