Two Vaccine Stories (Part 2): The Ethics of Silence - What Happens When Vaccine Truth Is Hidden?
When a vaccine is promoted as safe and effective—without full disclosure—what are the consequences for public trust, law, and personal rights?
This article is written with assistance from ChatGPT using the following prompt:
"Write a follow-up to an article about two vaccine stories—one effective and transparent, one promoted as effective but failed. Explore the legal and ethical consequences of misrepresenting vaccine safety/efficacy and what Canadians should ask, expect, and demand."
In my previous article, “Two Vaccine Stories” (Note: this article has been further extended with data evidence—you don’t want to miss that!), I contrasted two real-world vaccine cases:
Vaccine A was the one my dog Ringo never received—and tragically, he died as a result.
Vaccine B was taken by millions, including a substantial number of individuals who - according to Government official data - still died from the very disease it was supposed to prevent. Meanwhile, many others who remained unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated contracted the illness and fully recovered.
The key point was this: Vaccine A is nearly foolproof. Vaccine B is not.
But what happens when this fundamental difference is not disclosed? What happens when Vaccine B is promoted as if it were Vaccine A—as perfectly safe, completely effective, and unquestionably necessary?
This article explores that dilemma—and what every Canadian citizen should know, ask, and demand.
Omission Is Not Neutral—It’s Deception
When health authorities or vaccine providers fail to disclose the full scope of risks and uncertainties, they cross a line.
In legal terms, that’s called non-disclosure, and it can lead to informed consent violations.
In moral terms, it's a betrayal of trust.
Imagine being told that a product will protect you just like a seatbelt does in a crash—only to later learn that it works more like a lottery ticket. Would you still buckle up the same way?
That’s the difference between Vaccine A and Vaccine B. And when public health messaging blurs that line, it endangers both health and democracy.
Legal Implications in Canada
Under Canadian law, informed consent is not optional. It is a foundational principle of medical ethics and legal practice. To consent to a medical treatment, you must be provided:
A clear explanation of the benefits
A full disclosure of the risks and uncertainties
Awareness of reasonable alternatives
The right to refuse, without coercion or penalty
If a vaccine provider overstates efficacy, understates risks, or withholds relevant data (such as known adverse reactions or failure rates), they may be liable for:
Medical malpractice
Negligence
Misrepresentation or fraud
Violation of constitutional or charter rights, especially if mandates were enforced
What Should Every Canadian Ask Before Taking Vaccine X?
Before taking any vaccine—especially one not time-tested like Vaccine A—every Canadian should feel empowered to ask:
What is the actual efficacy rate? (Against infection, hospitalization, death?)
What are the known side effects—and how frequently do they occur?
Has the vaccine gone through full regulatory approval, or is it under emergency use?
Are there independent studies confirming the safety and effectiveness?
Is there long-term data on this vaccine’s performance?
Who is liable if something goes wrong? The manufacturer? The government?
If any of these answers are unclear, dodged, or refused—you have the right to walk away.
Accountability for Those Who Mislead
Those who promote a vaccine while knowingly omitting critical safety or efficacy data bear serious responsibility. This includes:
Government health agencies
Medical boards and associations
Media outlets
Individual physicians and pharmacists
Educational institutions enforcing mandates
Legal avenues for accountability include civil lawsuits, class actions, and even criminal liability if negligence rises to willful harm.
But the first step to accountability is awareness.
What Canadians Can—and Must—Do
Here’s what every citizen should do to ensure that what happened with Vaccine B never happens again:
Demand transparency in all health communications—not just slogans, but data.
Push for vaccine injury reporting systems to be open, accessible, and mandatory.
Support legal action when informed consent is violated.
Advocate for policy reform so that emergency authorizations cannot be abused or prolonged without justification.
Speak out publicly—because silence enables repetition.
Vaccine A and Vaccine B Are Lessons, Not Just Stories
We owe it to the next generation to draw the right conclusions from these two vaccine stories:
One represents the gold standard of immunization—predictable, safe, effective.
The other represents a case study in miscommunication, misinformation, and misplaced trust.
So when you are asked to take Vaccine X in the future, remember Ringo.
Remember the contrast.
And most importantly, remember this: a free society is built not on blind trust, but on informed choice. That’s why the recent move by the U.S. FDA is so significant—demanding full transparency through placebo-based randomized trials for all vaccines. To learn more about this important development in the U.S.—which we can now hope the Canadian FDA counterpart will adopt soon as well—read my article in my other substack linked below.
References
Canadian Medical Protective Association: Informed consent in Canada
Supreme Court of Canada: Reibl v. Hughes (1980)—landmark ruling on informed consent
Health Canada: Vaccine Approval Process and Post-Market Surveillance
Office of the Auditor General: Reports on COVID-19 pandemic response
Support This Work Across All Channels
If you believe in open dialogue, informed choice, and exploring underreported perspectives, help keep the conversation going—like and share this article on your preferred platform.
I write these articles on my own time as a contribution to my community—especially for those seeking truth and guidance in these increasingly censored times. Your support—through follows, likes, and shares—makes a real difference.
You can follow me here:
🔹 LinkedIn
🔹 Facebook
🔹 Twitter/X
🔹 YouTube (@Dr.Dmitry.Gorodnichy), YouTube (@IVIM)
My articles are, and will always remain, free to read.